As most people jump onto the next topic the media decided to throw at us, more information is coming out about COVID. Before we dive in, I want to state, we HAVE to stop letting the media outsmart us. We have to stop allowing them to control the direction of our focus toward what they want us to see and away from what they don’t.
Below are a series of links to articles discussing where COVID-19 originated. I’m not going to tell you what to think but I’m going to give you some of my thoughts and questions along the way.
ONE: Wet Market
Reading this Fauci was careful not to say the virus “came from a wet market.” Instead he says,”Well, I have no authority to call for anything, but I can certainly tell you how I feel. I think we should shut down those things right away. It’s just, it boggles my mind how when we have so many diseases that emanate out of that unusual human animal interface that we don’t just shut it down.”
TWO: The Virus Wasn’t CREATED in a Lab
Dr. Fauci “rejected a conspiracy theory that the novel coronavirus was created in a Chinese lab.”
THREE: Money Flowing from USA to China, Fauci is Warned
Read this. The United Sates funded specifically “gain of function” research “which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans.” Fauci even defended such studies after multiple scientists warned of risk and potential creation of pandemic scenarios.
Four: Norway Scientist Claims Coronavirus was Accidentally Released from Lab.
This article was posted and pulled from the internet within 24 hours. I’m sharing images so you can read what I was able to screenshot prior to its removal. If you click the link note the wording: “Controversial Coronavirus Lab Origin Claims Dismissed By Experts” What experts? They also use the words, “general scientific consensus.” Is there an accurate general scientific consensus?
My Thoughts:
With the obvious knowledge of the gain of function studies as evidenced by funding coming from the US, wouldn’t it be prudent to entertain the accidental release as a possibility immediately? Isn’t it wise especially in the realm of science to consider all possibilities? Immediate dismissal, to me, looks suspicious.
If we at least know it came from a lab and the dispute is whether or not it was man altered in the lab, why the wet market blame in the beginning? Why would Fauci, a “renowned, trusted” doctor who is of the highest intelligence try to make us think it came from a market?
The biggest troubling point for me: if we were studying this virus and how it could infect humans in order to develop ways to protect public health, isn’t it possible also that someone knows more about how the virus acts? If someone knows more about how it acts, they probably have more information on how to counter it.
This is reason enough not to admit wrong. I am not saying this is what happened with certainty. I am saying, to deny this as possible is in my mind turning a blind eye.
Dr. Fauci has advised six presidents, has multiple publications, awards and honors. In my mind, to not have his “finger on the pulse,” so to speak, at least enough to entertain and consider all possibilities is either ignorant or deliberate.
-Rita
